Via Insty comes this:
"If you create a gun-free zone, you're liable for any harm it causes."
On the surface, it sounds good, but is it? Who should it apply to? State and Federal governments? Private businesses?
I mean, it's a known fact that the police do not have a duty to protect you already. How could this be applied in reference to that?
Common sense, or nannyism?
UPDATE: Robb asks How about the opposite tack?
