NavigationWant to write for The Gun Blogs?User loginSearchWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.
Who's new
|
Metal Detectors Are Un-AmericanI've never liked metal detectors - well, except for the ones you use to look for lost items and buried treasure. It's the ones set up as barriers that I don't like. I've been thinking about why I don't like them and realized that it's because they're Un-American. The American Justice system was founded upon the then-radical principle of "innocent until proven guilty." It's arguable as to whether or not we're still operating on that principle, but in theory that's the basis. But metal detectors are based on a presumption of guilt. When I'm getting on an airplane, if you're assuming I'm a good person who is and will be innocent of wrongdoing then you won't really care what I have in my pockets. There are some things you'll want to warn me about using on a plane - for example the altitude tends to make butane lighters somewhat more... enthusiastic than they are at ground level which lead to more than a few signed nose hairs back in the day. Now if you think I'm not a good person - someone who's likely to do something evil while on the plane then you definitely want to know what I have in my pockets so you can do your best to keep me from causing any problem. So I'm not ranting against passenger screening - I think it's a good thing. But I am against the procedure they currently do. It's not 'passenger' screening, it's just a shakedown of the passerby. If they want it to work then they'll need to actually pay attention to the passengers rather than their pockets. Similarly, when I go to a concert or sporting event I not only think they have a right to kick / keep out 'fans' who disrupt the event and/or pose a hazard to others, I wish they'd do a better job of it. But I need someone to please explain to me why you need to see my car keys in order to achieve this? Wouldn't it make more sense to check on me rather than my possessions? If I'm the upright solid citizen I appear to be then a 1" blade on my fingernail clippers will not present a hazard and does not need to be confiscated. Which is why metal detectors are useless. They won't stop someone intent on doing wrong. At most they'll (slightly) incovenience them. They may cause the malfactor to not use a gun, but they won't stop them from bringing in bottles of flammable liquid. If I really want to use a gun on the far side of your metal detector then I'll either slip myself and/or the gun past it or I'll just shoot your (usually unarmed) 'Security Guard'. Metal dectectors can really only do one thing (other than annoy): enforce a climate of dependence and helplessness. And in a country founded on the concept of Individual Liberty that's definitely Un-American.
|
Ads
PollLinks
Recent blog posts
Stats |
The problem
The problem is not that the security forces do not "check on you" it's that if we get caught at it then someone will scream "PROFILING" and then it becomes a civil lawsuit etc.
I agree that a hand wand or a magnetometer are not fool proof and all that it does is "slightly" inconvenience a person determined to cause death and destruction, but we depend partly on that inconvenience to help along with one of the other weapons we use to protect people and things. To put it another way "we're always looking and trying to find the bad guy without stepping on a persons rights, which must be said, is a very fine balancing act".
You've hit the nail on the
You've hit the nail on the head:
The one effective tool - profiling - is the one you're not allowed to use so the fallback is to just annoy everyone.
Enjoy!
KCSteve :-)
Just between you and me
Just between you and me (and everyone reading this), sometimes the only joy we get is to annoy everyone. LOL! In reality, it annoys us too, but we must be thorough because God forbid anything gets onto a plane or in a federal facility. Because of the threat and also because we are constantly under scrutiny by the client (the facility), the regulating authority (DOJ or DHS or local PD), and our own company Quality Control personnel.
I don't have a good answer to the problem, but please be assured that for most of us we don't want to infringe upon a person.
You should hear the discussions we have off duty. You'd think you walked into a cross of a Ted Nugent and NRA convention!